A systematic approach to grouping the manuscripts involved these five classifications: Author, article grouping, original article subtype, prosthetic division, and statistical analysis.
The publication rate of authors from private sectors was higher than the corresponding rate for authors linked to government institutions. The years 2016 through 2020 witnessed a greater volume of publications that listed four or more authors. Original research publications led the way, with case reports appearing in the wake of that. In a systematic review, a noticeable upward trend was observed from 2016 to 2020 when compared to the earlier timeframe of 2011 to 2015. A markedly greater multitude of
In the published experimental studies, the statistical analysis involved a comparison of average values. Sensors and biosensors A surge in publications focused on materials and technology was observed, subsequently followed by articles on implants within the prosthetic division.
This analysis of the journal's development profiles the researchers, describes the research approaches, outlines the statistical methods used, pinpoints key research topics, and identifies national trends in prosthodontic studies.
Research trends within publications will focus on the salient research thrust areas and the specific types of research carried out within a particular field. Gaps in this research will be brought to light, along with suggested strategies for authors and journals moving forward. Comparative analysis with international prosthodontics publications aids in identifying crucial research areas, helping prospective authors tailor their work to maximize journal acceptance.
Forthcoming publications will prioritize the key research thrusts and the style of research within this specialization, thereby identifying gaps in research and suggesting future approaches for authors and academic journals. Prospective authors can benefit from the comparison with international publication trends in prosthodontics to align their research with the journal's priority areas, improving their chances of acceptance.
Through the comparison of three distinct drilling methods for implant site preparation, this study aims to augment the primary stability of early-loaded single implants in the posterior maxilla.
For the restoration of one or more missing teeth in the maxillary posterior area, 36 dental implants were employed in this study, using an early loaded implant approach. A random division of patients occurred, creating three groups. For group I, an undersized drilling method was utilized during the drilling process; group II adopted bone expanders for the drilling procedure; and group III used the osseodensification (OD) technique for their drilling. With regular intervals of immediately, 4 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after the surgery, the patients underwent both clinical and radiographic assessments. The statistical analysis process encompassed all clinical and radiographic criteria.
Group I implants all displayed stability and success, contrasting with the survival of eleven out of twelve implants in both groups II and III. Throughout the entire study, no substantial disparity was observed in peri-implant soft tissue health or marginal bone loss (MBL) across the three groups; however, implant stability and insertion torque exhibited statistically significant differences between groups I, II, and III at the initial placement stage.
The preparation of the implant bed using drills whose geometry mimics the implant to be inserted, through an undersized drilling approach, results in high primary implant stability without the need for additional instruments or extra costs.
Early loading of posterior maxilla dental implants is facilitated by an undersized drilling technique, which promotes superior primary stability.
Dental implants placed in the posterior maxilla can be early loaded, leveraging an undersized drilling technique that results in improved primary stability.
The study aimed to scrutinize the microbial seepage through restorative materials, using an antibacterial primer as an intracoronal barrier in certain instances and not in others.
This study encompassed fifty-five extracted single-rooted teeth. Employing gutta-percha and AH plus sealer, the canals were cleaned, shaped, and obturated, all at the established working length. After removing 2 millimeters of coronal gutta-percha, a 24-hour incubation period was implemented for the teeth. Based on the materials used as intracoronary orifice barriers, the teeth were grouped as follows: Group I, Clearfil Protect Bond/Clearfil AP-X; Group II, Xeno IV/Clearfil AP-X; Group III, Chemflex (glass ionomer); Group IV, a positive control (no barrier); and Group V, a negative control (no barrier, inoculated with sterile broth). Micro leakage assessments were performed using a sterile, two-chamber bacterial technique.
Serving as a marker for microbial life forms, it was considered. The percentage of leaked samples, the timeframe associated with the leakage, and the colony-forming units (CFUs) in the leaked samples were quantitatively assessed and analyzed using statistical methods.
A 120-day intracoronal orifice barrier trial across three materials demonstrated no statistically significant variance in bacterial penetration. Based on this study, the leaked sample of Clearfil Protect Bond demonstrated the lowest average number of colony-forming units (43 CFUs), followed by Xeno IV (61 CFUs) and glass ionomer cement (GIC) (63 CFUs).
This study concluded that the three experimental antibacterial primers were markedly more effective as intracoronal barriers compared to alternative approaches. While alternative methods may have been considered, Clearfil Protect Bond with an antibacterial primer displayed positive outcomes as an intracoronal orifice barrier, reducing bacterial leakage.
The success rate of endodontic treatment is directly influenced by the effectiveness of intracoronal orifice barriers in obstructing microleakage. Clinicians can successfully use antibacterial therapy against endodontic anaerobes due to this.
The ability of intracoronal orifice barriers to prevent microleakage is paramount to the success of endodontic treatment, a success predicated upon the properties of the utilized materials. Successful antibacterial therapy against endodontic anaerobes is facilitated by this approach for clinicians.
A cortico-cancellous block allograft's clinical and computed tomography (CT) evaluation was undertaken in the lateral alveolar ridge width deficit reconstruction before dental implant placement.
For bone augmentation prior to implant placement in ten randomly chosen patients with atrophic mandibular ridges, corticocancellous block allografts were utilized to correct the lateral ridge's deficiency. The grafted area underwent pre-operative and six months post-operative clinical and computed tomography (CT) assessments. Six months after the initial procedure, a surgical re-entry was executed to place dental implants.
In the course of the six-month evaluation, all block allografts exhibited a complete and successful integration with the host's tissues. The clinical assessment of all grafts revealed a firm rm consistency, full incorporation, and vascularization. CT and clinical measurements both confirmed a rise in bone width. The dental implants showed positive initial stability.
Lateral ridge defects can be effectively managed utilizing bone-block allografts as a notable grafting material.
Precise and accurate surgical methodologies permit the secure and convenient integration of this bone graft in implant placement regions, in lieu of autogenous bone grafts.
Precisely executed surgical procedures facilitate the safe application of this bone graft as a viable alternative to autogenous bone grafts, especially in implant placement zones.
To ascertain and compare the level of screw loosening in gold and titanium alloy abutment screws, without subjecting them to any cyclic loading, this investigation was undertaken.
The group of 20 implant fixture screw samples consisted of two subsets: ten gold abutment screws from Osstem and ten titanium alloy abutment screws manufactured by Genesis. Deep neck infection With a surveyor as a guide, the implant fixtures' insertion path was preserved as they were placed into the acrylic resin material. Employing a hex driver and a calibrated torque wrench, the initial torque was applied in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The hex driver and resin block had a vertical line and a horizontal line drawn over them. The acrylic block was positioned according to a standardized index using a fixed table and putty, while a digital single-lens reflex camera (DSLR) was positioned with its horizontal arm aligned horizontally to the floor and perpendicular to the acrylic box via a tripod mount. According to the manufacturer's instructions, photographs were taken immediately after the initial torque application and 10 minutes post-application. The re-torque for gold abutment screws was 30 N cm, while 35 N cm was specified for titanium alloy abutment screws. Photographic documentation was conducted in the exact same place, immediately after the re-torquing procedure and again three hours later. selleckchem Upon being uploaded to the Fiji-win64 analysis software, each photograph was subjected to the task of measuring its angulations.
Following initial torquing, both gold and titanium alloy abutment screws displayed signs of loosening. A noticeable discrepancy in screw loosening between gold and titanium alloy abutment screws emerged after initial tightening, with no change in the position of the abutment screws after three hours of re-tightening.
For the preservation of preload and the reduction of screw loosening, the re-torquing of both gold and titanium alloy abutment screws following a ten-minute initial torquing period is habitually performed, even before applying any load to the implant fixture.
While gold abutment screws might hold preload better than titanium alloy screws initially, re-torquing after ten minutes is often required to counter post-torquing settling in routine clinical applications.
Gold abutment screws, following initial torquing, may show a more favorable preload retention than their titanium counterparts; however, re-torquing after approximately ten minutes is essential for mitigating settling during routine clinical use.